The Diagnosis of Malingering in General Hospitals in the United States: A Retrospective Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample.

Objective: To characterize the socio-demographics and comorbid medical and psychiatric diagnoses of patients in the general hospital diagnosed with malingering. Method: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study using data from the 2019 National Inpatient Sample, an all-payors database of acute care general hospital discharges in the United States, querying for patients aged 18 and older discharged with a diagnosis of "malingerer [conscious simulation]," ICD-10 code Z76.5. Results: 45,645 hospitalizations (95% CI: 43,503 to 47,787) during the study year included a discharge diagnosis of malingering. 56.1% were for male patients, and the median age was 43 years (IQR 33 to 54). Black patients represented 26.8% of the patients with a discharge diagnosis of malingering, compared to 14.9% of all patients sampled. Zip codes in the lowest household income quartile comprised 39.9% of malingering diagnoses. The top categories of primary discharge diagnoses of hospitalizations included medical ("Diabetes mellitus without complications"), psychiatric ("Depressive disorders"), and substance use ("Alcohol-related disorders") disorders. "Sepsis, unspecified organism," was the most common primary diagnosis. Conclusion: The striking overrepresentation of Black patients in hospitalizations with diagnosis of malingering raises concern about the roles of implicit and systemic biases in assigning this label. The disproportionate number of patients of low socioeconomic status is further suggestive of bias and disparity. Another potential contribution is that the lower health literacy in these populations results in a limited knowledge of traditional ways to meet one's needs and thus greater reliance on malingered behavior as an alternative means. Accurate description of these patients' socio-demographics and comorbid medical and psychiatric diagnoses with reliable data from large samples can lead to improved understanding of how the malingering label is applied and ultimately better patient care.

Evaluating the performance of the MMPI-3 over-reporting scales: Sophisticated simulators and the effects of comorbid conditions.

OBJECTIVE: We examined the utility of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3) to detect feigned over-reporting using a symptom-based coaching simulation design across a control group and three diagnostic conditions: posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), minor traumatic brain injury (mTBI), and comorbid PTSD and mTBI. METHOD: Participants were310 college students who wererandomly assigned to one of the four conditions. For participants in the feigning conditions, they were provided with a descriptionof their respective disorder condition throughout the duration of the session and asked to feign according to their condition while completing the MMPI-3. RESULTS: MMPI-3 over-reporting scales perform well at classifying feigning. There is low sensitivity, high specificity, and effect magnitudes are medium to large range (1.12 - 2.47). There are no differences in scales assessing over-reporting between diagnostic conditions with dissimilar symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Findings provide initial support for the use of the MMPI-3 overreporting scales for detecting feigned PTSD, mTBI, and comorbid PTSD and mTBI. Further, individuals feigning different disorders, namely PTSD, mTBI, and comorbid PTSD and mTBI, feign predominantly general psychopathological symptoms, making Fp the strongest scale in terms of detecting these feigned disorders. Future research will benefit from establishing relevant diagnostic comparison groups to contrast with this study and utilizing known-group designs withboth PVT and SVT administration.

Race, health, and socioeconomic disparities associated with malingering in psychiatric patients at an urban emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: To examine clinical and sociodemographic differences between psychiatric patients suspected of malingering and non-malingering controls in an urban emergency department (ED) setting. METHODS: We used retrospective chart review to compare 57 psychiatric patients suspected of malingering with 195 date-matched controls. We examined evidence used for malingering and documented secondary gains. RESULTS: The prevalence of malingering was 5.6-7.1%, with documented evidence consistent with DSM-V guidelines. Malingering patients were more likely to be male (p < .001), > 45 years old (p = .002), Black (p = .049), unhoused (p < .001), and frequent users of ED (p < .001). Psychiatric diagnoses were found in ~75% of malingerers. Diagnosis of antisocial personality (OR = 8.03, p = .013) and substance use disorder (OR = 2.05, p = .018) predicted increased probability of malingering. Malingering encounters were more likely to result in discharges (p < .001). The most common secondary gains were unmet clinical needs. CONCLUSIONS: Results support adaptational models of malingering. Malingering patients are more likely to have sociodemographic vulnerabilities. A disproportionate number of malingering patients have unmet needs for psychiatric treatment and resources. The study provides further evidence for inequities that may be related to social and structural determinants of health.

Análisis descriptivo de la simulación de síntomas psicológicos en una muestra forense / Descriptive analysis of malingered psychological symptoms in a forensic sample

INTRODUCCIÓN: La simulación, definida como intento deliberado de mentir o engañar en relación con una enfermedad o discapacidad, exagerando la sintomatología, con el objetivo de obtener un beneficio personal, es un fenómeno complejo, poco estudiado en nuestro contexto profesional. El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar el modo en que se manifiesta dicho fenómeno en el ámbito forense. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se seleccionó una muestra incidental de 190 sujetos atendidos en la Unidad de Psicología (IMLCFC) durante 16 meses. Se les administró el Inventario estructurado de simulación de síntomas, a la vez que se valoraban ciertos indicadores clínicos de simulación y otros resultados psicométricos. Se realizó un análisis estadístico descriptivo de la muestra, así como de las correlaciones entre sospecha clínica y psicométrica, y entre sensibilidad del instrumento específico y de los instrumentos genéricos. RESULTADOS: El criterio clínico estructurado para detectar la simulación correlaciona moderadamente con el resultado obtenido en el Inventario estructurado de simulación de síntomas; la puntuación total en esta prueba presenta una correlación positiva, aunque atenuada, con los indicadores de exageración del principal test de psicopatología; la simulación es un estilo de respuesta altamente prevalente en sujetos de la jurisdicción social, con un patrón de respuestas significativamente incrementado respecto al observado en muestras penales. DISCUSIÓN: La valoración de la simulación de síntomas psicológicos en el contexto forense requiere de una estrategia multimétodo que incluya el juicio clínico estructurado, instrumentos específicos de detección y otras pruebas psicométricas complementarias, al efecto de generar validez convergente que contribuya a la detección de dicho fenómeno

INTRODUCTION: Malingering, defined as a deliberate attempt to lie or deceive in connection with an illness or disability, exaggerating the symptomatology, with the aim of obtaining a personal benefit, is a complex phenomenon, seldom studied in our professional context. The objective of this study was to analyse the way in which this phenomenon manifests itself in the forensic field. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An incidental sample of 190 subjects attended in the Psychology Unit (IMLCFC) over 16 months was selected. The Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) was administered to them, while assessing certain clinical indicators of malingering and other psychometric results. A descriptive statistical analysis of the sample was performed, focusing on the correlations between clinical and psychometric suspicion, and on specific vs. generic test sensitivity. RESULTS: The structured clinical criterion to detect malingering correlates moderately with the result obtained in the SIMS; the total score in this test presents a positive, albeit attenuated, correlation with the exaggeration indicators from the main psychopathology test; malingering is a highly prevalent response style in subjects seeking work-related sickness compensation, with a pattern of significantly increased responses compared to that observed in criminal samples. DISCUSSION: The assessment of malingered psychological symptoms in the forensic context requires a multi-method strategy that includes structured clinical diagnosis, specific detection instruments, and other complementary psychometric tests, in order to generate convergent validity that contributes to the detection of this phenomenon

Prevalence of ADHD symptom malingering, nonmedical use, and drug diversion among college-enrolled adults with a prescription for stimulant medications.

Malingering of ADHD symptoms is a potential means of nonmedical use of prescription stimulants (NMUPS). The Subtle ADHD Malingering Screener (SAMS) provides a potential avenue for identification of symptom malingering. However, no real world evidence of this scale has been published to date. The goal of this study was to examine patterns of use of stimulant prescriptions and to evaluate the ability of the SAMS to identify NMUPS. This study employed a cross-sectional observational design to administer an online, self-administered survey instrument in a convenience sample of college-enrolled young adults with a prescription for stimulant medications at a campus pharmacy. Respondents were asked about their prescription characteristics, nonmedical use and drug diversion behavior, along with ratings on the SAMS. Over 33% of respondents self-reported past-year NMUPS and 18% reported past-year drug diversion. Over 35% of respondents rated NMUPS as being slight or no risk and 55% were classified by the SAMS as likely to be malingering or exaggerating their symptoms. Individuals reporting past-year NMUPS or diversion consistently scored higher on the SAMS. The SAMS showed potential for future application in the pharmacy setting. Further research is needed to evaluate the relationship of SAMS to NMUPS or drug diversion. The results of this study also highlight several growing issues with the diagnosis and treatment of ADHD among young adults enrolled in college. Addressing perception of risk, social norms, and providing healthcare professionals with tools to prevent misdiagnosis is critical to the management of this issue.

The Incidence of Diagnosis of Munchausen Syndrome, Other Factitious Disorders, and Malingering.

BACKGROUND: Systematic studies on factitious disorders and malingering in large populations are rare. To address this issue, we performed a nationwide epidemiological study in Norway on the incidence of these diagnoses in an unselected patient population. In particular, we tried to confirm the diagnoses and to estimate the contribution of Munchausen syndrome to the spectrum of factitious disorders. METHODS: We analyzed data obtained from the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR), which provided a deidentified list of all patients from 2008 to 2016 who had received the ICD-10 diagnosis of F68.1 or the diagnosis code Z76.5. RESULTS: Altogether, 237 patients (99 females; 138 males) received a diagnosis of F68.1. Code Z76.5 was applied to 52 patients (12 females; 40 males), all diagnosed within health institutions. Three of 1700 specialists (somatic specialist, psychologist, or psychiatrist) in private practice had diagnosed a factitious disorder in altogether 87 patients. After contacting these specialists, we could identify no true case of F68.1. For 24 of 146 patients who were equally distributed by gender within health institutions, we managed to identify the diagnosing healthcare providers. Of these 24 patients, only 11 correctly qualified for code F68.1. Only two female patients qualified for a Munchausen syndrome diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: There is a male predominance for the diagnosis of malingering. An earlier suspicion of a female predominance for Munchausen syndrome is upheld. There is significant underdiagnosing and misdiagnosing for both conditions and for factitious disorders in general. To separate the most serious form of factitious disorders from milder forms and to facilitate more systematic research, we recommend a specific ICD diagnosis for Munchausen syndrome.

Malingering in the Psychiatric Emergency Department: Prevalence, Predictors, and Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Malingering is commonly encountered in the psychiatric emergency department, yet little is known about its prevalence, objectives, or effect on patient management. This study analyzed characteristics of malingering and patient disposition in a 24/7-staffed comprehensive psychiatric emergency program (CPEP) and created predictive models to understand malingering and its effect on physician decision making. METHODS: Attending psychiatrists completed questionnaires after comprehensive assessments of 405 patients presenting to the CPEP during the 1-month study, recording suspicion of malingering, symptoms malingered, associated secondary gains, demographic characteristics, and initial disposition decision. Analyses examined characteristics associated with degree of malingering suspicion and disposition. RESULTS: Malingering was suspected among one-third of patients, and 20% were strongly or definitely suspected of malingering. High suspicion was associated with malingering of multiple symptoms and was likely to result in immediate discharge. Lower suspicion was associated with being held for further observation. Among patients for whom suspicion of malingering was high, malingering was most frequent for suicidal ideation (58%) and depression (39%); malingering was often used to seek hospital admission (54%) and to stay in the CPEP (35%); malingering was sometimes used to seek multiple secondary gains (25%); and malingering often involved multiple symptoms (44%). Patients for whom suspicion was high had an admission rate of 4%. Among patients suspected of malingering, three variables each independently increased the likelihood of hospital admission: seeking social work or housing services, seeking admission, and malingering of suicidal ideation. CONCLUSIONS: Malingering was prevalent in the psychiatric emergency department, and suspicion of malingering was associated with disposition differences. Disposition was significantly influenced by both suspicion of malingering and the gains sought by patients.

Malingering and factitious disorder.

Although exaggeration or amplification of symptoms is common in all illness, deliberate deception is rare. In settings associated with litigation/disability evaluation, the rate of malingering may be as high as 30%, but its frequency in clinical practice is not known. We describe the main characteristics of deliberate deception (factitious disorders and malingering) and ways that neurologists might detect symptom exaggeration. The key to establishing that the extent or severity of reported symptoms does not truly represent their severity is to elicit inconsistencies in different domains, but it is not possible to determine whether the reports are intentionally inaccurate. Neurological disorders where difficulty in determining the degree of willed exaggeration is most likely include functional weakness and movement disorders, post-concussional syndrome (or mild traumatic brain injury), psychogenic non-epileptic attacks and complex regional pain syndrome type 1 (especially when there is an associated functional movement disorder). Symptom amplification or even fabrication are more likely if the patient might gain benefit of some sort, not necessarily financial. Techniques to detect deception in medicolegal settings include covert surveillance and review of social media accounts. We also briefly describe specialised psychological tests designed to elicit effort from the patient.

University students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): a literature review.

OBJECTIVES: To review existing literature about university students with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). METHODS: A framework for scoping studies and content analysis were used to source and review selected publications from PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar and relevant bibliographies. RESULTS: Seventy-four publications were reviewed and key findings were categorised under six core themes that represent the issues germane to university students with ADHD. These themes are: academic, social and psychological functioning, giftedness, new media technologies, treatment, substance misuse and the non-medical use of prescription stimulants, and malingering. CONCLUSION: In Ireland and the United Kingdom (UK) young people with ADHD are unlikely to enrol into further education, and of those who do go to university, few will graduate at the same time as their non-ADHD peers. ADHD is associated with poor educational outcomes and it may be a hidden disability within institutions of higher education (e.g. universities). Surprisingly, in this topic area, there is a paucity of research in Ireland and the UK. Most studies originate from North America were research activity in the field has been ongoing since the 1990s. These studies however, tend to use relatively small samples of college (university) students recruited at a single institution. It is difficult to generalise the findings of these studies to student populations in North America, let alone in Ireland and the UK. At the very least, these North American studies provide insights into key areas of concern. This topic area straddles education and psychiatry. This means an inter-disciplinary approach is required to examine, better understand and address the impact of ADHD on the educational outcomes of university students. The philosophies of difference, equity and self-realisation can offer a conceptual framework for conducting further research and/or developing services to deliver more personalised learning support for university students with ADHD.

Neural correlates of response bias: Larger hippocampal volume correlates with symptom aggravation in combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder.

The diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is vulnerable to the simulation or exaggeration of symptoms as it depends on the individual's self-report of symptoms. The use of symptom validity tests is recommended to detect malingering in PTSD. However, in neuroimaging research, PTSD diagnosis is often taken at face validity. To date, no neuroimaging study has compared credible PTSD patients with those identified as malingering, and the potential impacts of including malingerers along with credible patients on results is unclear. We classified male patients with combat-related PTSD as either credible (n = 37) or malingerers (n = 9) based on the Morel Emotional Numbing Test and compared structural neuroimaging and psychological questionnaire data. Patients identified as malingerers had larger gray matter volumes in the hippocampus, right inferior frontal gyrus and thalamus, and reported higher PTSD symptoms than credible PTSD patients. This is the first structural neuroimaging study to compare credible PTSD patients and malingerers. We find evidence of structural differences between these groups, in regions implicated in PTSD, inhibition and deception. These results emphasize the need for the inclusion of SVTs in neuroimaging studies of PTSD to ensure future findings are not confounded by an unknown mix of valid PTSD patients and malingerers.

Performance on the Test of Memory Malingering is predicted by the number of errors on its first 10 items on an inpatient epilepsy monitoring unit.

OBJECTIVE: Performance validity testing is an increasingly vital component of neuropsychological evaluation, though administration of stand-alone performance validity tests (PVTs) can be time-consuming. As the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) is among the most commonly used and researched PVTs, much work has focused on creating abbreviated versions while preserving diagnostic accuracy. A recent addition to this effort, errors on the first 10 items of Trial 1 (TOMMe10), was analyzed for its utility in predicting TOMM performance. METHOD: Subjects were 180 veterans seen on a long-term epilepsy monitoring unit. TOMM learning trials, Word Memory Test (WMT), and WAIS-IV Digit Span (for Reliable Digit Span; RDS) were administered as part of a larger battery. Performance invalidity was classified using established cut scores. Diagnostic classification statistics were calculated predicting TOMM, WMT, and RDS performance, including sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristics (ROC), and positive and negative predictive values for multiple TOMMe10 cut scores. RESULTS: A cut score of ≥2 errors on TOMMe10 yielded the highest sensitivity (.88) while maintaining ≥.90 specificity when predicting TOMM (also supported by ROC analysis). This cut score was also optimal when validated against combinations of PVTs (e.g. two of TOMM, WMT, and RDS; WMT and/or RDS). CONCLUSIONS: TOMMe10 shows great promise in predicting future TOMM performance. In settings where time with patients is at a premium, ≥2 errors on TOMMe10 may be used as an early TOMM discontinue criteria, allowing examiners to use their limited time more effectively. The use of TOMMe10 in settings with varying TOMM failure base rates was discussed.

Liability for Diagnosing Malingering.

Malingering is a medical diagnosis, but not a psychiatric disorder. The label imputes that an evaluee has intentionally engaged in false behavior or statements. By diagnosing malingering, psychiatrists pass judgment on truthfulness. Evaluees taking exception to the label may claim that the professional has committed defamation of character (libel or slander) when the diagnosis is wrong and costs the claimant money or benefits. Clinicians may counter by claiming immunity or that the diagnosis was made in good faith. This problem has come into focus in military and veterans' contexts, where diagnoses become thresholds for benefits. Through historical and literary examples, case law, and military/veterans' claims of disability and entitlement, the authors examine the potency of the malingering label and the potential liability for professionals and institutions of making this diagnosis.

[Use of the Symptom Validation Test BEVA in Social Medical Assessment]. / Einsatz des Beschwerdenvalidierungstests BEVA in der sozialmedizinischen Begutachtung.

The present study investigates whether the BEVA is suitable to detect negative response bias by claimants with psychosomatic symptoms in the social medical assessment. 107 claimants for disability pension to a psychosomatic disorder fulfilled the BEVA, SIMS and a sociodemographic questionnaire. The social medical examiners assess the credibility of the complaints representation. A Known-Group-Design and a Bootstrapping-Design was used to estimate the validity of the BEVA. For the external criterion SFSS the following psychometric characteristics for the BEVA could be determined: specificity=0.86, sensitivity=0.42, positive predictive value=0.81, negative predictive value=0.51. The interrater reliability estimates with Cohen κ=0.253. If the expert's assessments are chosen as external criterion following psychometric characteristics were estimated: specificity=0.71, sensitivity=0.32, positive predictive value=0.38, negative predictive value=0.66. The rater agreement is Cohen κ=0.031. The results show that the BEVA has an excellent specificity in the detection of negative response bias. This is highly desirable in terms of an ethically moral discussion. Furthermore, the study shows that - in addition to the expert estimates - further screenings can improve the assessment of negative response bias.

Escenarios de simulación clínica creados por alumnos de medicina: descripción de la experiencia de 2 años / Clinical simulation scenarios designed by medical students: The description of a two-year experience

No disponible

Poor symptom and performance validity in regularly referred Hospital outpatients: Link with standard clinical measures, and role of incentives.

We investigated the frequency of symptom validity test (SVT) failure and its clinical correlates in a large, heterogeneous sample of hospital outpatients referred for psychological assessment for clinical purposes. We studied patients (N=469), who were regularly referred for assessment to the psychology departments of five hospitals. Background characteristics, including information about incentives, were obtained with a checklist completed by the clinician. As a measure of over-reporting, the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) was administered to all patients. The Amsterdam Short-Term Memory test (ASTM), a cognitive underperformance measure, was only administered to patients who were referred for a neuropsychological assessment. Symptom over-reporting occurred in a minority of patients, ranging from 12% to 19% in the main diagnostic patient groups. Patients with morbid obesity had a low rate of over-reporting (1%). The SIMS was positively associated with levels of self-reported psychological symptoms. Cognitive underperformance occurred in 29.3% of the neuropsychological assessments. The ASTM was negatively associated with memory test performance. We found no association between SVT failure and financial incentives. Our results support the recommendation to routinely evaluate symptom validity in clinical assessments of hospital patients. The dynamics behind invalid symptom reporting need to be further elucidated.

Prevalence of below-criterion Reliable Digit Span scores in a clinical sample of older adults.

OBJECTIVE: The Reliable Digit Span (RDS) is a well-validated embedded indicator of performance validity. An RDS score of ≤7 is commonly referenced as indicative of invalid performance; however, few studies have examined the classification accuracy of the RDS among individuals suspected for dementia. The current study evaluated performance of the RDS in a clinical sample of 934 non-litigating individuals presenting to an outpatient memory disorders clinic for assessment of dementia. METHOD: The RDS was calculated for each participant in the context of a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment completed as part of routine clinical care. Score distributions were examined to establish the base rate of below criterion performance for RDS cutoffs of ≤7, ≤6, and ≤5. One-way ANOVA was used to compare performance on a cognitive screening measure and informant reports of functional independence of those falling below and above cutoffs. RESULTS: A cutoff score of ≤7 resulted in a high prevalence of below-criterion performance (29.7%), though an RDS of ≤6 was associated with fewer below-criterion scores (12.8%) and prevalence of an RDS of ≤5 was infrequent (4.3%). Those scoring below cutoffs performed worse on cognitive measures compared with those falling above cutoffs. CONCLUSIONS: Using the RDS as a measure of performance validity among individuals presenting with a possibility of dementia increases the risk of misinterpreting genuine cognitive impairment as invalid performance when higher cutoffs are used; lower cutoffs may be useful when interpreted in conjunction with other measures of performance validity.

Nuevo simulador híbrido cadavérico/sintético para la enseñanza de técnicas intervencionistas para tratamiento del dolor refractario / New hybrid simulator to teach pain procedures for refractory pain management

Se presenta un nuevo simulador para el entrenamiento y evaluación de técnicas intervencionistas bajo visión fluoroscópica en medicina del dolor que permite realizar los procedimientos más utilizados a nivel de cabeza y cuello, tronco, región lumbosacra y pelvis. En el trabajo se desarrolló una inclusión de material óseo cadavérico en material sintético versión no transparente color piel y transparente para entrenamiento en bloqueos bajo visión ecográfica y fluoroscópica combinados. El Nuevo Simulador Híbrido se basó en la inclusión artesanal de material óseo cadavérico dentro de un tejido de material sintético emulando, con elevado realismo, el modelo humano. En la experiencia de los educandos que realizaron los talleres durante el año 2014 expresaron alta satisfacción comparando a pacientes reales, cadáveres frescos y simuladores sintéticos. Este desarrollo permite, como características principales: a) repetir cada procedimiento las veces necesarias para que cada educando alcance un estándar mínimo exigible y disminuya el número y tipo de errores posibles propios de cada técnica; b) entrenar adecuadamente para los procesos de certificación; c) facilitar evaluar la eficacia de entrenar con estos modelos frente al entrenamiento en pacientes reales u otras formas de entrenamiento (simuladores o cadáveres frescos); d) mejorar la accesibilidad por su bajo costo evitando la complejidad de la preservación de tejidos, y e) permitir, en opinión del autor, reducir la curva de aprendizaje en un medio seguro para paciente, educando, docente y el sistema de salud y universitario (AU)

This paper introduces a new simulator to be used in the training and evaluation of interventional techniques under fluoroscopic visualization in pain medicine, apt for repeating the most broadly used procedures in the head and neck, trunk, lumbosacral region and pelvis. This simulator is built using cadaveric bones in synthetic transparent material for training in nerve block procedures under combined ultrasonic and fluoroscopic guidance. The 'New Hybrid Simulator' comprises the use of cadaveric bones surrounded by synthetic material resembling human models in a highly realistic manner. The trainees that attended the workshops during 2014 expressed a high degree of satisfaction when comparing this model to practicing on real patients, fresh cadavers and synthetic simulators. The salient features of this development are: repeating the procedures as many times as necessary for each trainee to meet the minimum requirements and reduce the number and type of potential errors in each technique; conducting appropriate training for certification purposes; facilitating the evaluation of efficacy of training using these models as compared to training on real patients or other modalities (simulators or fresh cadavers); improving accessibility given its low cost, thus avoiding the complexity involved in the preservation of tissues and finally, in the author's opinion reducing the learning curve in a safe setting for patients, trainees, trainers and for the healthcare and university systems at large (AU)

Valoración psicométrica de la simulación de síntomas psíquicos en el ámbito forense / Psychometric assessment of malingering psychical symptoms in the forensic context

No disponible

Visión subjetiva de la reanimación cardiopulmonar durante el entrenamiento. ¿Qué podemos aprender para mejorar la formación? / A subjective view of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during training. What can we learn to improve this?

No disponible

Performance Invalidity Base Rates Among Healthy Undergraduate Research Participants.

Few studies have examined base rates of suboptimal effort among healthy, undergraduate students recruited for neuropsychological research. An and colleagues (2012, Conducting research with non-clinical healthy undergraduates: Does effort play a role in neuropsychological test performance? Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 27, 849-857) reported high rates of performance invalidity (30.8%-55.6%), calling into question the validity of findings generated from samples of college students. In contrast, subsequent studies have reported much lower base rates ranging from 2.6% to 12%. The present study replicated and extended previous work by examining the performance of 108 healthy undergraduates on the Dot Counting Test, Victoria Symptom Validity Test, Word Memory Test, and a brief battery of neuropsychological measures. During initial testing, 8.3% of the sample scored below cutoffs on at least one Performance Validity Test, while 3.7% were classified as invalid at Time 2 (M interval = 34.4 days). The present findings add to a growing number of studies that suggest performance invalidity base rates in samples of non-clinical, healthy college students are much lower than An and colleagues initial findings. Although suboptimal effort is much less problematic than suggested by An and colleagues, recent reports as high as 12% indicate including measures of effort may be of value when using college students as participants. Methodological issues and recommendations for future research are presented.